Harvard University, Women-Only Gyms, and Anti-Religious Bigotry

March 5, 2008 7 Comments »

HarvardHarvard University is in hot water over its decision to schedule women-only hours at one of its gyms to accommodate requests from women Muslim students whose religious beliefs prohibit them from working out in front of men in exercise wear.

Harvard has scheduled only six women-only hours per week out of the seventy hours the gym is open. The gym at which these hours are scheduled is the least convenient and least used gym on campus. There are many women who prefer to work out in a women-only environment for reasons which have nothing to do with their religion.

Unbelievably, despite all this, people are still protesting.

Men and women are different. Men will always ogle and hit on women, and women will always feel uncomfortable being ogled. This is why there are women-only fitness clubs and women-only hours at co-ed fitness clubs and swimming pools. The women who claim it’s sexist to have women-only hours that other women want are the same women who are offended that in the post-feminist era, some women have the gall to choose to stay home and raise their children.

However, there is a more subtle issue here. If the request for women-only hours had come from women who just want to exercise without being ogled, then there would surely be less complaining. A good deal of the complaining is motivated by religious intolerance. Not just generic religious intolerance, mind you, but specifically intolerance against Muslims.

Why should Jews care about this? For one thing, Jews are well aware that the winds of intolerance can shift on a moment’s notice. Fighting bigotry and prejudice against all religions helps keep us free to practice ours in peace as well.

Furthermore, the request at Harvard could just have easily come from observant Jewish women, who observe practices of dress similar to observant Muslims. (Well, it could have come from Jewish women if it weren’t for the fact that centuries of anti-Semitism at Harvard have cowed most of the Jews there into submission, but that’s a topic for a different time.)

Kudos to the feminists who had the self-confidence and self-respect to ask Harvard to accommodate their needs, and kudos to Harvard for displaying religious tolerance by doing so!

(Simulblogged.)



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Related Posts

  • http://www.deadair.tv Moshe Glasser

    I would have hoped the idea of women-only hours would be obvious. I work at a Passover program in Phoenix where we have a constant struggle regarding separate swimming. Many people want it, but it’s incredibly difficult logistically – the pools are all very exposed. it would be one thing if the separate gym hours were mandatory, but there is a difference between allowing people the opportunity to practice their religion (something this country was founded on) and forcing others to do so.

  • http://Deadairmedia.com Zechariah Mehler

    You would think that with the success of a gym like Curves people would be more open to the idea of women only gyms. What I really find interesting about this is how intolerant it is. Think about it in terms of how much do you have to give a fig to get your hackles up about 6 hours of gym time?

  • http://www.jasonunger.com junger

    There are women-only gyms, in fact, there is one in Cambridge, with a few other locations in and around Boston.
    http://www.healthworksfitness.com/index.php

  • David Gertler

    Hi Jason,
    I’m sure that you are aware that certain amenities, like a workout gym, a university provides for its students are free of additional charge. When a student is paying tens of thousands of dollars for an education it’s always nice not to have to pay an extra 50 dollars a month for something provided for free to others. The gym you link to is Christian run (St. Mary’s) and built specifically for battered women. Its membership fees are waved for those in specifically poor condition. Any student working to pay for their education would have to pay to work out in that gym. They would also be exposed to things just as bad or worse than in a standard co-ed gym. The article mentions that there are multiple gyms on campus. For them to turn one gym into an all women’s gym, what could possibly be your issue? Everyone else could work out in the other gyms. It is astonishing to me that your sensitivities do not allow less than one tenth of the time available at one of at least three locations to be devoted to a few people who would feel uncomfortable otherwise.
    Frankly, I’m disappointed the times offered are not more convenient to those women. The fact is that the reason more women aren’t taking advantage of the new hours is because they feel it is a semi-cordial gesture so that people can say “we tried to offer you what you wanted but you didn’t take it.” Do you really feel it is fair for you to say “if you want an all women’s gym, there is one for homeless women and ex-cons not far away?”

  • http://www.jasonunger.com junger

    Hey David — you make an astonishing leap in assumption to opine on my “sensitivities,” especially when my comment makes no argument one way or the other.

    Why are you so quick to jump on me when you don’t know my feelings on the subject? Read my comment again and see if it says anything besides actual facts.

    FWIW, I went to school in Boston. My wife went to the gym I linked to (she’s not battered) as did a number of other frum women who wanted to work out in an all-female environment.

    Your assumption (again) that the gym being “Christian-run” somehow makes it a place for Jews to fear is a ridiculous notion.

    Relax a little bit, seriously.

  • http://www.jasonunger.com junger

    David – one more thing. You said:
    Do you really feel it is fair for you to say “if you want an all women’s gym, there is one for homeless women and ex-cons not far away?”

    If you do a little research, you’ll see that only 1 of the company’s 6 gyms is “non-profit.” The other 5 gyms are a great place to work out — that’s one of the reasons they can charge a lot per month for it.

    One of them is actually in one of the most expense malls in the greater Boston area.

    Obviously, I’ve never gone inside, but like I said, my wife has. I trust her opinion (she’s actually been a member) way more than yours.

  • David Gertler

    Jason,
    I apologize. You are correct, you made no claims about your personal feelings on the issue. And I was basing my response only on what I read on their website and not from first hand reports.

    But, I stand by my comments. I never said that being Christian run would offend the sensitivities of Jewish women, and your claim of implication on my part was equally reading into my words as I was reading into yours. The fact that is Christian run merely suggests that it may have some literature on display by the front door, or some of their healing classes might, again, might, suggest that the women who are admitted for free call on the power of Jesus.

    If all you were doing was suggesting another alternative should Harvard not be more accommodating, I take back any accusation and ask your forgiveness for my assumption. But if you were suggesting that the women of Harvard not try to push for an on-campus women’s only gym schedule BECAUSE there is another alternative I stand by what I said.

    Again, for readers, check out the gym’s website and decide for yourself. I did not mean to make this a discussion on the value of this other gym.

    Jason, you are free to have the last word on this issue.